-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: catch username password inside urls #169
Merged
baruchiro
merged 17 commits into
Checkmarx:master
from
hagarfisher:feat/catch-username-password-inside-URLS
Aug 23, 2023
Merged
feat: catch username password inside urls #169
baruchiro
merged 17 commits into
Checkmarx:master
from
hagarfisher:feat/catch-username-password-inside-URLS
Aug 23, 2023
+123
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hagarfisher
force-pushed
the
feat/catch-username-password-inside-URLS
branch
from
August 11, 2023 15:52
29b8173
to
92f1fe9
Compare
baruchiro
suggested changes
Aug 13, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you, good luck!
I think you did good work, please see my comments and share what you think.
…thub.com/hagarfisher/2ms into feat/catch-username-password-inside-URLS
hagarfisher
changed the title
Feat: catch username password inside urls
feat: catch username password inside urls
Aug 14, 2023
baruchiro
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very good, please see my comments.
baruchiro
reviewed
Aug 22, 2023
baruchiro
reviewed
Aug 22, 2023
baruchiro
approved these changes
Aug 22, 2023
Co-authored-by: Baruch Odem (Rothkoff) <baruchiro@gmail.com>
baruchiro
reviewed
Aug 23, 2023
baruchiro
reviewed
Aug 23, 2023
baruchiro
approved these changes
Aug 23, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #165
After researching the Gitleaks docs, I concluded that adding a toml file won't extend the current rules. This is due to the way this project extends Gitleaks.
Proposed Changes
I submit this contribution under the Apache-2.0 license.